Before APEC Leaders Arrive, Homeless People Are Cleared From San Francisco’s Streets.

Democrats have argued against the efficacy and humanity of walls and barriers, and there has been controversy around their erection in San Francisco. The left-leaning people who constructed these walls have accused the city’s elite citizens of having double standards. The walls are there to protect them.

The difference between the Democrats’ previous stances on walls and their present behavior is what really matters in this case. Democrats have been among the most outspoken opponents of walls and fences, claiming that they are cruel and ineffective. The building of these walls in San Francisco, nevertheless, appears to go counter to those earlier opinions.

One particular issue in San Francisco is the building of walls to barricade off specific locations while relocating a sizable portion of the city’s homeless population to other areas. Keeping the homeless population hidden from foreign leaders and dignitaries attending gatherings like APEC seems to be the driving force behind these activities. Opponents claim that this strategy contradicts the compassion and inclusivity that some Democrats have fought for.

The irony in this scenario is not lost on San Francisco residents or onlookers. They have drawn attention to the contradiction in the positions of left-wingers who had opposed walls but are now constructing them for their own security.

NEW: San Francisco is unrecognizable as the city has completely cleansed itself of homeless people ahead of Biden’s meeting with Chinese President Xi.

All it took was a communist to come to town for San Francisco to get their act together?

Not only is the city making homeless… pic.twitter.com/Vwv4kzQlUY

— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 12, 2023

The topic has also sparked debates over the effectiveness of barriers and walls. Opponents contend that these structures shouldn’t be completely disregarded if they are successful in protecting particular areas. In the context of national discussions about public safety and border security as well as the usefulness and morality of erecting walls and other barriers, this argument touches on more general issues.

To sum up, Democrats who have previously opposed wall construction now at the center of the dispute in San Francisco. The circumstance calls into question wall effectiveness in different contexts, consistency, and how homeless groups are treated. It emphasizes how intricate and perhaps contradictory political debate and decision-making can be.