AdBlock Detected

It looks like you're using an ad-blocker!

Our team work realy hard to produce quality content on this website and we noticed you have ad-blocking enabled.

U.S. Media Blames Saudi Arabia for 9/11 Amid Shift Away from Dollar in Oil Trade


The U.S. media has sparked renewed controversy regarding Saudi Arabia’s purported role in the 9/11 attacks, leading to a dramatic turn of events. This action follows Saudi Arabia’s recent choice to shift its oil trade away from the U.S. dollar, the global reserve currency. The timing of these accusations has generated extensive discussions and apprehensions on the geopolitical and economic consequences, as well as the underlying motives behind the media’s abrupt attention to these historical allegations.

The move by Saudi Arabia to decrease its dependence on the U.S. dollar for oil transactions is a notable change in the worldwide economic environment. Throughout history, the U.S. dollar has consistently been the primary currency used for global oil commerce, which has further strengthened the economic dominance of the United States. The petrodollar system, as it is commonly known, guarantees that the global oil trade strengthens the value of the U.S. dollar.

Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia’s recent decision to carry out oil transactions using alternative currencies, such as the Chinese yuan, indicates a deliberate change in strategy. This shift is perceived as an attempt to broaden economic alliances and decrease reliance on the United States in light of escalating geopolitical tensions. The potential ramifications for the global economy are significant, as it poses a challenge to the established financial system and can undermine the dominant position of the dollar. Prominent U.S. media outlets have intensified their coverage, establishing a connection between Saudi Arabia and the 9/11 attacks in response to these recent developments. Although more than twenty years have passed since the horrific events of September 11, 2001, the belief that Saudi leaders were involved in the attacks has reemerged with increased vigor.

Prominent news organizations have recently produced investigative reports and opinion articles reexamining the conclusions of the 9/11 Commission Report. The report did not discover any definitive proof that the Saudi government or senior Saudi officials were aware of and backed the hijackers. However, the media’s recent emphasis on Saudi involvement has caused suspicion, especially considering the timing aligning with Saudi Arabia’s economic transition. Political analysts and observers have promptly highlighted the connection between Saudi Arabia’s economic actions and the revival of these accusations. Critics contend that the media’s emphasis on 9/11 is a calculated endeavor to besmirch Saudi Arabia’s global reputation and exert influence on the country due to its recent choices.

YouTube player

The geopolitical consequences of Saudi Arabia’s decision to shift away from the dollar are substantial. Saudi Arabia is reducing the risks related to variations in the value of the dollar and strengthening its relationships with developing global powers such as China by diversifying its currency portfolio for oil trade. This geopolitical reorganization has the potential to result in a more multipolar global economy, thereby diminishing the dominance of the United States.

From an economic standpoint, the transition away from the dollar could influence global financial markets. The demand for U.S. dollars has historically been supported by its utilization in the oil trade. A decrease in this demand could result in a dollar devaluation, impacting several aspects such as inflation rates and interest rates in the United States. Moreover, it has the potential to expedite the adoption of alternative currencies in international commerce, posing a greater challenge to the dollar’s dominant position.

The media’s increasing emphasis on Saudi Arabia’s purported connections to the 9/11 attacks also has consequences for how the public perceives the situation. The narrative evokes strong emotions and recollections among the American public, perhaps influencing public opinion against Saudi Arabia at a crucial moment. Whether deliberate or fortuitous, this strategy aims to present Saudi Arabia’s economic initiatives in a framework of suspicion and past resentments.

The families of the victims of the September 11 attacks and advocacy groups have been consistently demanding more openness and responsibility in investigating the possible links between the hijackers and Saudi officials. The resurgence of media attention offers a venue for these perspectives, although it also prompts inquiries regarding the deliberate timing and the wider geopolitical motives.

YouTube player

The confluence of Saudi Arabia’s economic policy shift and the heightened emphasis by the U.S. media on claims related to 9/11 is an intricate and multidimensional matter. Saudi Arabia’s shift away from the dollar poses a substantial threat to the existing economic system, carrying extensive consequences for global finance and geopolitics. However, the specific timing and level of media attention connecting Saudi Arabia to the events of 9/11 give rise to inquiries regarding the underlying intentions and outcomes of this narrative.

As global observers witness these unfolding events, the interaction between economic strategies and historical narratives will persistently influence the conversation. This circumstance highlights the complex interrelationships between geopolitics, media influence, and public perception, emphasizing that in the field of international affairs, actions and narratives are closely interconnected.

Follow us on social media: Instagram, Threads & Twitter X @nya360_    YouTube & Facebook @nya360.

More Posts

Scroll to Top